Blog

Where’s my solution bucket?

Yesterday, my dad rang me up to tell me that he’d written a letter to The Log (a magazine for airline pilots) and that his letter had been published and he had won a prize. A £200 voucher for specsavers – exciting stuff indeed. My dad loves writing letters, especially if he’s got some important point making to do, and he promised to email me a copy. I read it this morning and it gave me food for thought.


According to my dad, the letter below was in reply to an article by ‘”Some military arse” in which he banged on about how airline pilots should practice hand flying more’.

This same ‘military arse’ apparently used the term Armageddon to mean a big emergency in the air.

 

“I read Jonathon Dunn’s article in The Log Feb/March 2012 and came away rather confused. Although he claims to not be “Just another military arse”, his article is so full of military slang and jargon that I would be surprised if he had spent much time in an airliner cockpit.

I certainly would agree with him that watching an autopilot for an hour doesn’t hone the control handling skills as much as an hour’s aerobatics or, maybe an hour’s glider towing, but that is not what it is about.
My job in the Airbus I fly is mostly management; not getting into circumstances where great skill is required either in the air or on the ground. I have a crew, a ground crew and a hundred and fifty passengers none of whom are subject to The Air Force Act, but all of whom are part of what I attempt to achieve every day. I have just chatted to my First Officer who agrees that what he is learning to be is a Captain, not a pilot with fantastic flying skills.
What we do in an hour of cruise is often to talk, often, inevitably about our job, very often about how either we or others have made the right decision or got it wrong. This is probably more valid than hand flying the aircraft for that hour.
What we are both doing is putting more items in our “solution bucket”, that helpful little place where we keep the solutions to problems that have happened before so we can take them out, see if they fit what is happening now and use or reject as seems fit. My “solution bucket” has a lot more items in it than the First Officer’s because I have had 18,000 more hours to find things to fill it.
Current thinking is that most skills (from cabinet making to driving a car) require about 10,000 hours to reach the highest levels of skill. That is probably as true of managing an aeroplane and the people on and around it as anything else. Most of the problems I attempt to minimise in my job are definitely not connected with moving the controls, indeed fairly high on the list of priorities when things go wrong is engaging the autopilot.
That would also apply in “Armageddon”.
Verdun Luck
A320 Capt”
I considered how through most of the documentary making process that I too was creating and making use of a “solution bucket”. The only problem is that, like the first officer, my bucket currently isn’t brimming with many solutions. At times, the current film I’m making has caused me a great deal of anxiety as I don’t feel experienced or well equipped enough to complete it satisfactorily. In an odd way my dads’ idea of a “solution bucket” has given me some comfort. Ok I may not have all the answers now but all I need is some more “flying hours” and hopefully I’ll find them. Failing that, I’ve certainly utilised the skill of turning a positive into a negative!

Eyebombing With Kath

It’s times like these that really make you re-evaluate your life choices.

 

 

When meeting various contributors for this documentary each of them have had suggestions for other unusual pastimes I might want to look into. Probably one of the strangest (yet weirdly the most appealing to me) was ‘EyeBombing’ which, is simply the practice of sticking googly eyes to objects you believe should have a face. So there I was, standing outside the Festival Hall London with yarn bombing Kath, as she magically produced a bag of googly eyes and a gluestick from the depths of her bag. Although I’d only known Kath for two hours at this point I’d decided this was exactly the kind of behaviour that I could expect from her.

A strange sense of excitement and anticipation passed through me as I glued and carefully positioned the googly eyes onto our chosen spot. Kath, a primary school teacher by day, even resisted correcting my work – she thought the eyes were too close together – and we stood back and admired my handiwork. Whilst I was enjoying the high I was getting from this unprecedented cheap thrill, I was interrupted by a tap on my shoulder. I turned around feeling jumpy and felonious to find my housemate, Fred, from a few years back standing behind me.

 

We exchanged the appropriate small talk and I asked him what he was doing tonight. It turned out he was performing in the Festival Hall that night. He turned his attention to me and asked what it was I was doing. I stopped for a second. When you bump into people from your past you usually want to express how well it is you’re doing. Suddenly, a random, silly and whimsical activity was potentially about to define my life; Fred was performing in one of London’s most prestigious concert halls and here I was sticking googly eyes to the exterior of it.

 

It’s times like these that really make you re-evaluate your life choices. It is also at these times that you develop the skill to make something out of nothing. As I found myself explaining I was meeting a participant for a new exciting documentary that I was producing/directing whilst simultaneously overemphasizing it’s broadcast potential. I dropped in buzzwords like  ‘vision’ ‘story arc’ and ‘transmedia’ just to make sure he knew that I knew exactly what I was talking about. He presumably left unconcerned and I got back to the important matter in hand – repositioning those eyes.

Documentary filmmaker would like to meet . . .

All goods films, including documentary, are totally reliant on their characters. Without characters there simply is no story. I discovered this the hard way recently when I went out to shoot a short one minute film and my contributor for the day was a no show – I realised pretty quickly that there was only so many ‘establishing’ shots I could do before it was clear that I could not eek out any kind of story.

In the meantime two friends and I dreamt up a new idea for a documentary film, The New Age Stamp Collectors, in which stand-up comedian Peter Otway, a procrastination enthusiast, attempts to find out if the latest communications technology has just allowed us to waste time in new but perhaps pointless ways. Much like the pastime of stamp collecting, it was decided that geocaching, online blogging and flash mobbing may be regarded by some as meaningless, nonsensical and trivial activities. To find out if these activities did have meaning and value, and I’m sure they do, I needed to find and meet some people that did them. I thought it would be easy. I was mistaken.

I can’t easily get my head around new technology, I am at heart a luddite, but as so many people talk of the ease of the Internet for communication I thought it wouldn’t be too difficult to quickly find some people to talk to. I tried googling ‘geocaching’ and ‘flash mobs’ and although there are a multitude of web pages about those subjects it’s not so easy to find the people that do them. The main problem I came across was anonymity. Call me old fashioned but I like to be able to pick up the phone and talk to people directly. In my attempt to track some people down I filled out countless online forms, ‘Facebooked’ people, tweeted at them, about them, to them, I tried commenting on their blogs but thus far I have received only one and a half responses. Slim pickings for a week’s work.

No one, it would seem, is terribly willing to give out their telephone number or email address. Probably quite rightly, as we’re always told not to give out personal information willy nilly, pre-warned of identity theft etc., but right now this particular detail is problematic for me. Finding a flash mob organiser was proving particularly difficult. The very nature of the activity - ’a group of people who assemble suddenly in a public place, perform an unusual and seemingly pointless act for a brief time, then disperse’ means that the organisation is particularly anonymous. I’m currently in a very mysterious email exchange with a flash mob organiser, who’s name and gender I’m yet to learn, who leaves me short and unrelated answers to the questions I ask. This is why I’ve only counted him (or her) as half a response. Seems reasonable.

It’s not just the anonymity, I imagine many people – probably with busy lives, loving families and important jobs – don’t actually check their emails, blogs or website accounts all that often. And when they do, they probably think ‘oh, I’ll reply to that later’ and then promptly forget all about it. I’m not proud of it, but I’ve been known to reply to a text a month after I actually received the original message. It was probably from my mum, as far as I know she’s the only one that ever texts or rings me. Furthermore, I probably can’t be that surprised that people don’t respond to an email out of the blue by a complete stranger asking if they’d be interested in contributing to a documentary.

I was reaching a point of desperation – I knew that I had a great documentary idea at my fingertips – you just get that gut feeling sometimes – but I just lacked any information about the potential characters that would appear in the film. I then started to wonder what I even knew about Pete (you remember, the stand-up comedian I mentioned earlier, the main protagonist of the whole documentary idea) so I brainstormed on a piece of paper and identified only three character traits I could be sure of:

bearded, likes fried-chicken, usually broadly affable

Followed by a decline to be involved in the project from my other response from the week I reached a crisis point and decided I wasn’t a terribly good producer/director and definitely not a child of the technological revolution. What had I been thinking? You can’t just google geocaching and find someone willing to talk on camera about it. I needed a plan B, a new modus operandi if you will. Ideally I needed these characters to come to me.

I have a friend who champions the perks of online dating. He’s on numerous sites and spends a great deal of time crafting his personal ad, selecting his best photographs and searching for the right woman. At first I thought he might be alone but I soon realised that Internet dating doesn’t carry quite the same stigma that it used to and that lots of my friends utilise it. I thought perhaps I could devise my own personal ad, you know something like ‘documentary filmmaker would like meet . . .’ and see if anyone tried contacting me wanting to contribute to the film. Surely it was worth a try?

So here I am waiting for a response. Although I’ve just realised that my friend is still single, so maybe this wasn’t the best idea I’ve ever had.

Latest Tweets

 

Facebook Wall

Facebook Status

OAuthException: Error validating access token: User 1285872601 has not authorized application 407819735909228.